Comparison · Abstract API alternative

IP-Atlas vs Abstract API (IP Geolocation)

Abstract API's IP Geolocation product surfaces security fields on the free tier, then removes them on the Starter paid tier, then restores them on Professional ($39/mo). IP-Atlas keeps security fields on every tier, including Free.

Pricing verified from abstractapi.com/api/ip-geolocation-api as of 2026-04-22.

Plans at a glance

TierIP-AtlasAbstract API (IPGeo)
Free$0 · 60K/mo · every field · card req.$0 · 1K/mo · security fields included
Starter$19 · 2M/mo · every fieldStarter $17/mo (annual) · 60K/yr · security fields removed
Mid$79 · 10M/moProfessional $39/mo · 500K/yr · security fields back
Upper$249 · 50M/moScale $159/mo · 2M/yr

Yes, that's right — Abstract's Starter tier has fewer fields than Free. You have to step up to Professional to get security data back. The intent is likely upsell gating; the user-experience effect is confusion.

Volume comparison: Abstract's Scale tier at $159/mo gives 2M queries per year (≈167K/mo). IP-Atlas's Developer at $19/mo gives 2M per month.

Field coverage

FieldIP-Atlas (every tier)Abstract FreeAbstract Starter $17Abstract Pro $39
country, region, city, coords, timezone, ASN
is_vpn / is_proxy / is_tor
is_hosting / is_datacenter

When Abstract API is the right choice

When IP-Atlas is a better fit

Data verified from abstractapi.com, as of 2026-04-22. Not endorsed by Abstract.